English

智能化农业装备学报(中英文) ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2): 105-110.DOI: 10.12398/j.issn.2096-7217.2025.02.010

• • 上一篇    

肉鸡福利养殖的发展现状与趋势

王祎娜(), 王鹏军, 陈聪()   

  1. 农业农村部南京农业机械化研究所,江苏 南京,210014
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-18 修回日期:2025-04-10 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈聪
  • 作者简介:王祎娜,女,1984年生,内蒙古呼伦贝尔人,硕士,副研究员;研究方向为农业机械化政策管理。E-mail: 2895127342@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目

Current status and trends of broiler welfare farming

WANG Yina(), WANG Pengjun, CHEN Cong()   

  1. Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Nanjing 210014,China
  • Received:2025-02-18 Revised:2025-04-10 Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-20
  • Contact: CHEN Cong
  • About author:WANG Yina, E-mail: 2895127342@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    The Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

摘要:

随着全球畜牧业可持续发展理念的深入推进,肉鸡福利养殖已成为产业转型的重要方向。本研究从政策、技术及市场多维视角系统分析了肉鸡福利养殖的发展现状、核心挑战与未来趋势,并对比了欧盟、美国等发达地区与中国在实践路径上的差异。研究表明,欧盟通过《2007/43/EC号指令》等法规建立了较为完善的福利养殖框架,明确要求控制饲养密度(33~42 kg/m2)、保障光照与通风条件,并逐步推广慢速生长品种(日增重≤50 g/d,上市日龄49~81 d),其福利指标显著优于传统模式。美国虽缺乏联邦统一立法,但部分州(如加利福尼亚)通过《农场动物虐待防止法》推动空间与健康管理改进,行业龙头企业亦开始试点慢速品种(日增重50 g/d,上市日龄≥56 d)和地板养殖系统。相比之下,中国虽在2017年发布《农场动物福利要求 肉鸡》团体标准,但福利养殖仍以出口导向型企业为主,白羽肉鸡产业仍以高密度笼养(≤33 kg/m2)为主导,通过栖架、垫料等措施局部改善黄羽肉鸡的养殖福利,整体普及率还受限于政策、成本与消费者认知。技术层面,智能化装备成为提升福利的关键驱动力。未来趋势显示,消费者溢价支付意愿将推动市场分化,而5G、AI与机器人技术的融合有望进一步降低福利养殖成本。政策上,欧盟计划修订法规强化执行力,中国需构建本土化福利养殖标准体系。本研究为全球肉鸡产业的绿色转型提供了理论参考与实践启示,建议各国应基于资源禀赋与技术条件,探索差异化路径——发达国家可强化政策约束与技术创新,发展中国家则需平衡效益与福利,逐步推进标准化与市场化。

关键词: 福利养殖, 鸡, 饲养技术, 畜牧养殖, 可持续发展

Abstract:

With the deepening advancement of sustainable development concepts in global animal husbandry, welfare-oriented broiler farming has emerged as a critical direction for industrial transformation. This study systematically analyzes the current status, core challenges, and future trends of global broiler welfare farming. It employs a multidimensional perspectives including policy, technology, and market dynamics, while comparing the practical approaches adopted in developed regions (e.g., the EU and the U.S.) and those in China. Research demonstrates that the EU has established a relatively comprehensive legislative framework for welfare farming through regulations such as *Council Directive 2007/43/EC*, which mandates controlled stocking density (33-42 kg/m2), optimized lighting and ventilation conditions, and the gradual adoption of slow-growing breeds (daily weight gain ≤50 g/d, slaughter age 49-81 days). These measures have significantly improved welfare indicators compared to conventional practices. In contrast, while the U.S. lacks unified federal legislation, certain states (e.g., California) have enacted laws like the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act to promote improvements in space allocation and health management for farm animals. Furthermore, leading industry stakeholders in the U.S. have also initiated piloting slow-growing breeds (50 g/d, slaughter age ≥56 days) and floor-rearing systems. China, though having released the Animal Welfare Requirements for Broilers (T/CAS 267-2017) group standard in 2017, still implements welfare farming practices predominantly confined to export-oriented enterprises. The white-feathered broiler sector remains dominated by high-density cage systems (≤33 kg/m2), while yellow-feathered broilers exhibit partial welfare enhancements through measures such as the provision of perches and litter. However, widespread adoption of comprehensive welfare practices in China is hindered by policy gaps, cost constraints, and limited consumer awareness. Technologically, intelligent farming equipment has become a key driver for welfare enhancement. Future trends indicate that an increasing consumer willingness to pay premiums for welfare-assured products will foster market segmentation. Concurrently, the integration of advanced technologies, including 5G connectivity, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and robotics, is expected to further reduce the costs of welfare farming practices. From a policy perspective, the EU plans to revise regulations to strengthen enforcement mechanisms, whereas China faces the imperative of developing and implementing localized welfare standards. This study provides theoretical and practical insights relevant to the sustainable and welfare-conscious transition of the global broiler industry. It recommends that countries adopt differentiated pathways based on their resource endowments and technological capabilities—developed nations are advised to reinforce policy constraints and technological innovation, while developing countries should aim to strike a balance between production efficiency and animal welfare through gradual standardization and market-oriented approaches.

Key words: animal welfare, chicken, sustainable development, animal husbandry, technological innovation

中图分类号: